Do you find wire wrapping to be an easy method for building your circuits?
The same prototyping methods that are good for digital are not good for analog, and vice versa.
For
digital, yes, wire wrap is very practical, easy, reliable, and makes for much better density and performance than soldering wires. See my page, "Answering Wire-Wrap (WW) Questions and Doubts," at
http://wilsonminesco.com/6502primer/WireWrap.html . Wire-wrap sockets are more expensive than soldertail, and the PLCC ones are
far more expensive, but a handful of them is still a lot cheaper than making a single multilayer PC board, and if someone were timid about taking the time to learn a CAD and committing to an expensive multilayer board that may need changes or additions in the future, the WW PLCC sockets still make sense.
Wire wrap is not so good for
analog, because of all the discrete components. For analog, I have used dozens of the Radio Shack 276-170 analog prototyping PC boards which have the same pattern that the common solderless breadboards with the hundreds of plug-in contacts have.
Similar but with more buses plus holes at the ends for connectors is
BusBoard Prototype Systems' BR1:
Although these prototyping boards are so nice for analog, they are not good for getting decent performance in digital work. See my page "Construction: Avoiding AC-Performance Problems" at
http://wilsonminesco.com/6502primer/construction.html
